Master Procrastinator

Everyone's good at something…I'm the best at…let me get back to you on that.

  • Advertisements

Federer-Nadal Rivalry Takes a New Turn

Posted by Andrew Zercie on May 17, 2009

I am not a huge tennis fan, but I have always been fascinated by the rivalries that the sport has spawned over the years. Right now, it could be argued that the best rivalry in all of sports, and not just tennis, is the one that exists between Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer.

Last summer, Nadal bested Federer in an epic, five-set Wimbledon final. It was easily the best tennis match in years, perhaps decades. Most importantly, it put an exclamation point on a shift in the rivalry between the two top talents in the sport of tennis.

For nearly three years, Rafael Nadal chased Federer. Sure, Nadal had proven he could beat Federer on clay courts, and had an advantage in head-to-head matchups overall, but the perception was that Roger Federer was the better player. He won Wimbledon and the US Open year after year, and often threw in the Australian Open to boot. Federer was hailed by many as the next to assume the Greatest of All Time mantle from Pete Sampras.

But a funny thing happened on the way to becoming the next GOAT. Rafael Nadal’s win at Wimbledon shifted perception. Many began to view his career in a new light. He was no longer just a clay court specialist. Now, Nadal was seen as equal to, or greater than Roger Federer, something viewed as blasphemous not long ago.

The shift in perception became more pronounced this past winter, when Nadal won his first Australian Open crown, defeating Roger Federer in the final. While that match wasn’t quite the classic that the 2008 Wimbledon final had been, the fact that Nadal beat Federer on grass and hard court surfaces began speculation that Federer’s career may be on the decline, and that Rafael Nadal may emerge as this generation’s top threat to Sampras’s record.

Today, once again, perception may be shifting.  This time, with Nadal wearing the bullseye, Federer shocked the world’s top player at the Madrid Open, on clay, with the French Open looming.

The surprising straight-set win by Federer came a day after Rafael Nadal outlasted Novak Djokovic in their semifinal match. In post-match comments today, Nadal acknowleged that the four-hour match against Djokovic impacted his ability to handle Federer.

Perhaps though, Roger Federer has overcome the psychological impact of having to hold off Nadal and retain the top ranking week after week. Perhaps now, holding steady in the No. 2 spot and trying to overtake Nadal for the top ranking, Federer’s career has been rejuvenated.

Maybe this year at Roland Gaross, Roger Federer will finally claim the French Open title that has eluded him thus far.

And, if that happens, perhaps this rivalry will be on equal footing heading into Wimbledon this summer, setting the stage for yet another classic match between the two greatest players of this generation.


2 Responses to “Federer-Nadal Rivalry Takes a New Turn”

  1. Jack said

    While it’s obvious the rivalry has shifted…no brain twister there. However, I’ll rightly argue it’s due to the age difference and the natural peaking of Nadal’s, and ebbing of Federer’s, career more than some equal-footing shift in the rivalry. Federer is in his waning years at the top…just as Sampras was…and will likely not reclaim the top ranking in dominating fashion as he once did. He may be number one again and I’m sure will win another Slam or five, but only via a lapse in Nadal, injury, or similar situation. They’re both incredible players, and will rightly be viewed as two of the greatest of all time. Arguing who is better among them, Sampras, Laver, etc…is pointless in my opinion. They’re very different players. Besides, Federer has to contend with Murray and to a slightly lesser extent, Djokovic now, so it’s not a two way challenge any more.

    As for Federer’s French Open chances, his winning would have to be a scenario as we saw last week: Nadal getting Djokovic in his half of the draw, and Djokovic either knocking Nadal out of the French, or wearing him down in an exhausting semi-final…allowing Federer (assuming he gets through and easily) to beat him in the final. Not very likely, but who knows? This is Grand Slam tennis, and anything can happen over the course of 7 matches.

    • az0610 said

      Thanks for reading Jack.

      Great analysis as well.

      I agree with you on many of your points. The point I was trying to make was that, if Federer was going to win at Roland Garros, it would be because he’s gotten past the psychological hurdle of slipping in the rankings and falling behind Nadal in both stature and talent.

      All things being equal, Nadal is the better player. He’s younger, he’s held an edge in head-to-head matches over Federer for some time, and he’s won 3 of the last 4 Slams.

      Again, I appreciate your input and your sound analysis.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: